This ad campaign by Twix is used mostly as a humorous take on the
most unique part about Twix bars, which is that there are two in each pack. The
company has constructed a fictional feud between the two factories that
separately manufacture the two bars. The backstory to the split is explained in
a previous ad in the campaign, in which two men argue and build their
respective factories next to each other. The commercial shows the left Twix
factory at work. The imaginative machinery and river of caramel (like the very
famous river of chocolate) a tour that is reminiscent of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. Even though there is little
dialogue in the commercial, there are obvious rhetorical devices in effect. The
strategies used in the commercial convince viewers that the Twix bar is
delicious and high quality, regardless of which side may be better.
The commercial
was aired frequently on Comedy Central, which makes sense, because this
commercial is obviously geared more toward a young, easily amused audience.
Children also fit the target audience for a commercial like this, because of the
funny plot and simple jokes. Kids, much like adults who are up too late, are
very susceptible to mental cues to buy sweets and junk food. The Twix company
is hoping to entertain the audience with the plot; as if it were a small sitcom
during the commercial break. The central, albeit fictitious, argument of the
commercial isn’t to get the audience to by the Twix bars at all, but to get the
audience interested in the continuing storyline, and interested in the pseudo
argument.
The Toulmin
Model for this commercial’s argument is intentionally nonsensical. The central
claim is that the left Twix bar is better than the right Twix bar, which the
audience knows is a straw man argument anyway, because no one (outside of the
Twix Company in another ad) would argue that one bar is inherently better than
the other. The commercial itself is meant to serve as evidence, when the guide
feverishly defends the integrity of the ingredients of the left Twix bar, and
again assert that the right Twix bar is inferior. The warrant, therefore, would
be that candy bars that are made with more patience and better ingredients are
superior. However, the only backing for this is that left Twix bars are made
this way, and the conclusion should then be drawn that left Twix bars are
better. This is circular logic, because the reasons given to prove that the
left Twix bar is better, already assume that the left Twix bar is better.
Overall,
because it is an advertisement, the overarching goal is to convince you to buy
Twix candy bars. The real Toulmin model’s claim would be something along the
lines of “You should buy a Twix bar”, and is missing a qualifier and rebuttal
like most commercials. Just having you look at the flowing caramel and
cascading chocolate for a full 30 seconds can convince your body that it needs
the candy all on its own. The allusion to Charlie
and the Chocolate Factory is really just as effective for promoting an
emotional response to the Twix bars. Millions of people watch the movie as
kids, and remember it fondly when they grow up; it’s a classic. So, this is
another link between the two target audiences of the commercial: children and
young adults.
The effect of
the commercial is successful, despite the circular logic and entirely false
premise for the argument and setting. After watching the commercial repeatedly,
it’s almost impossible to not be hungry for a Twix bar.
I think it's clever that the Toulmin argument they present in this ad can only be countered by the argument in the other ad in the campaign because both are so nonsensical. The writers set up the commercials to act off of one another, which is uniqwue
ReplyDeleteOne of its major selling points as a commercial is that it is circular logic. One side of a Twix bar cannot be better than the other, but both present evidence that their methods of creating the candy is better. This just overall increases the brand's image of quality and deliciousness. The argument is also presented to the audience so they could potentially debate it over social media, so it can be spread to an even wider audience and gain more popularity.
ReplyDeleteI thought that the parts about the fact that the factitious argument was good in the ad as a whole to bring in people to not by the product but to want to know what happens next like you said. the parts about when and on what channels the ads were put on was also interesting and added to the reason they were showing repeatedly how the candy was made and the ingredients that people know twix for.
ReplyDeleteI love this commercial. I think that they also were talking to the kids in this commercial more because the whole theme and set up was the same as Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. Your warrant was clever and I would agree with Michael that it is super clever that they can make counter arguments with the Right Side Twix.
ReplyDelete